Home
Store
Membership
Codes, Standards & Guidelines
Education
Certification & Testing
 
 

Bulletin Board Archive

Bookmark and Share
ICC Bulletin Board   
my profile login | search | faq | forum home

  next oldest topic   next newest topic
» ICC Bulletin Board » Regional Chapter Communication Forums » Rocky Mountain (Region XI) » fire wall between C-store and fast food

   
Author Topic: fire wall between C-store and fast food
Phil Hancock
Junior Contributor


Rate Member
 - posted      Profile for Phil Hancock           Edit/Delete Post 
With a fast food of 2405 sf and 42 fixed seats in a c-store/gas station building of 6053 total sf, can the fast food be considered part of the M occupancy and not require a seperation wall that would be required between an A2 and an M occupancy?

--------------------
Phil Hancock

Posts: 2 | From: Ogden, Utah | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
fatboy
Frequent Contributor


 - posted      Profile for fatboy           Edit/Delete Post 
Well, my initial take on this is the A2 is larger than 750 sf, larger than 10% of the main use, so yes, separation is required. Or, sprinkle the whole thing, as an A2 over 5K sf would require, as the mosr restrictive use, and go non-separated uses. Pick your poison. Assuming,(I know) 2003 IBC unamended.

--------------------
Arguing with an inspector is like wrestling with a pig in mud.....
after a while you realize the pig enjoys it!

1997 FLSTF

Posts: 2335 | From: Northern Colorado | Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
Phil Hancock
Junior Contributor


Rate Member
 - posted      Profile for Phil Hancock           Edit/Delete Post 
Would it be possible to include the fast food as part of the M occupancy if the occupant load is less than 50 as allowed in 303.1 exception 2?

--------------------
Phil Hancock

Posts: 2 | From: Ogden, Utah | Registered: Mar 2007  |  IP: Logged
fatboy
Frequent Contributor


 - posted      Profile for fatboy           Edit/Delete Post 
I don't think so, in the commentary for 303.1 it speaks of the exception being applied when it is a stand-alone occupancy, not an accessory use to the main occupancy.

"These types of spaces are to be considered to be Occupancy Group B when they are not accessory to another occupancy."

So, I think the specific requirements of 302.2 and 302.2.1 would prevail, requiring it to be separated or comply with 302.3.1. JMHO

--------------------
Arguing with an inspector is like wrestling with a pig in mud.....
after a while you realize the pig enjoys it!

1997 FLSTF

Posts: 2335 | From: Northern Colorado | Registered: Jun 2000  |  IP: Logged
   

   Close Topic   Feature Topic   Move Topic   Delete Topic next oldest topic   next newest topic
 - Printer-friendly view of this topic
Hop To:


ICC Home Page

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3